Drone Attack on US Forces in Jordan: Kremlin Calls for De-escalation
In an exclusive report, our sources have delivered comprehensive details around the topic ‘Drone attack on US forces in Jordan.’ More notably, this article will analyze the Kremlin’s urging for de-escalation in the Middle East after the attack that struck US soldiers.
US Military Retaliates
Three US service members were tragically killed in a drone attack in Jordan, inciting the U.S. military to execute strikes against Iran-backed militants. In a widespread retaliation, 85 sites across western Iraq and eastern Syria fell under attack. This robust response came as no surprise following the January 28 attack in Jordan. Significant structural damage in western Iraq and devastating human loss – with 29 rank-and-file fighters confirmed dead – emerged as consequences. Also struck was the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s Quds Force, responsible for Tehran’s relations with regional militias.
A Series of Actions
In what the Biden administration has confirmed will be the first in several reactionary measures, the U.S. military has conducted over 100 airstrikes across Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. These operations were initiated in response to the various Iranian-backed attacks on U.S. troops including the drone strike in Jordan that ended three soldiers’ lives. The U.S. has also marked Houthi rebels in Yemen, aiming for protection against attacks on international vessels and U.S. Navy ships. The military reaction has been met with contestation, with notions that the response is insufficient or delayed. The strikes have resulted in further casualties with reports of civilians and guards losing their lives in Iraq and Syria. This authorization has faced harsh criticism from certain Republican lawmakers arguing that the response lacked force or punctuality.
Escalating Tensions and International Concerns
In the aftermath of a drone attack on a US military outpost in Jordan on January 28, the death of three US service members and the injury of more than 40 others, the global response was imminent. The U.S. then ordered prominent airstrikes on targets in Iraq and Syria in retribution for the drone attack. This military action conjured responses from various Middle Eastern countries, including Syria, Iraq, and Iran.
The Kremlin, through their spokesman Dmitry Peskov, voiced concerns over increasing tensions in the Middle East after a drone attack along the Syrian-Jordanian border severely affected three US soldiers. According to Peskov, the evident tension in the region is ‘very alarming’, urgently hinting at the need for de-escalation. Russia’s standpoint emphasizes measures for conflict prevention and calming of the strained Middle East.
The weekend saw an unmanned aerial drone targeting U.S. forces based in northeast Jordan, resulting in U.S. service members’ casualty reports. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq claimed responsibility for the attack. The US dismisses this claim, blaming Iran for their support of militias in Iraq and Syria. Pentagon officials fully support President Joe Biden’s proclamation that the US ‘shall respond’ to the assault. The complex regional dynamics and various international role-players in Middle East conflicts underline this response.
